|
| |
NEWS - Mar 2008

UnjustIS caches offline the full texts and
originating urls of News content.
This page features news and news items relating to UnjustIS matters.
Follow the hyperlinks to the external
source (opens in a new window) or an UnjustIS
news sheet.
Most recently posted items top the list.
To report
broken or outdated links please visit the Contacts section.
Solicitors
and other lawyers making the bad news from 2003 to date: News Roundup
Essential developments and newly available
information building news in the background.
Essential
Use Ctrl+F to search this page - or use the
Site Search facility to search all
UnjustIS content.
News navigation
|
Title and
description of item or excerpt. |
Links - the
full story |
Date posted
on UnjustIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiddling solicitor struck off
A SOLICITOR who took money from the dead for work he had not carried out has
been thrown out of the profession. Christopher Dudzinski, 49, of Dudzinski
and Partners, Butts Court, Leeds, claimed thousands of pounds from the
estates of late clients and ploughed the cash into his firm. Investigators
found he also told customers he was investing their money when in fact it
was being kept in the firm's accounts. Financial records were not properly
written up and an investigation in 2006 revealed a £25,975 'black hole' in
the client accounts. Dudzinski accepted he withdrew clients' money before he
billed them for his work, the Solicitors' Disciplinary Tribunal in London
heard. "A large part of the shortfall, £21,230, was in respect of costs
transferred from client to office account in circumstances where bills had
not been delivered to the client," said Jonathan Goodwin, for the
Solicitors' Disciplinary Authority. Dudzinski was acting for the executors
of a will when he took £2,350 from the estate of a dead man after his
affairs had been completed. When questioned, the lawyer said he thought he
deserved more for the work done previously. |
Yorkshire Evening Post |
01 Apr |
|
News organisation in new bid
to overturn 'obscene' no win, no fee libel
A group of 22 organisations is lobbying the government for radical change in
the regime controlling the Conditional Fee Agreement system under which
lawyers bring libel claims against media groups on a no-win, no-fee basis,
it has emerged. The disclosure came as David Price, of Fleet Street-based
law firm David Price Solicitors and Advocates, discussed the workings of and
reasons for the Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) system at the IBC Defamation
Conference in London on March 11. The CFA system allows lawyers to bring
libel cases against media organisations, on behalf of claimants who
otherwise could not afford to sue, on a no-win, no-fee basis. If the case
succeeds, the defendant pays the claimant's costs. But the defendant also
then has to pay the solicitors a "success fee" which can be as much as their
normal fee - meaning that the solicitor charges up to double his normal
fees, taking the charges to as much as £900 per hour for a partner in a law
firm. |
Press Gazette |
27 Mar |
|
Crackdown on £20bn a year
fraud Fraud is costing the UK
£20bn a year, the police say, as they plan to expand their efforts to tackle
it. The City of London Police is recruiting for a national fraud crime
force, claiming that the impact of the crime is second only to drug
trafficking. The move comes after a report by the Association of Chief
Police Officers (Acpo) put UK mortgage fraud losses at £700m a year, and
growing. |
BBC |
26 Mar |
|
Britain among the world's 50
main money laundering countries, says US
The US government has placed the
UK alongside Afghanistan, Colombia and Russia on a list of countries that
need to do more to crack down on money laundering, it emerged yesterday.
According to the US state department's international narcotics control
strategy report, Britain is one of more than 50 "major money-laundering
countries", thanks largely to its role as a leading global financial centre.
The report highlights figures from the UK's Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca)
which show that £15bn of dirty money is laundered in the UK each year.
Although it praises the UK's high street banks for tightening their
anti-laundering controls, the report warns that criminals are increasingly
turning to card fraud, cash-smuggling and bureaux de change to process the
proceeds of their activities. |
Guardian |
22 Mar |
|
Buy-to-let investors who fear
they may be left homeless
Buy-to-let investors are facing
their hardest times since amateur landlords first hit the scene in force a
decade ago. Property values are falling, rents are static, and interest
rates are on the way up - assuming buy-to-letters can find mortgages now
that many lenders have toughened up their criteria.
But for many investors - including Chris Miller and Geoff Morris - it's more
than belt-tightening that's needed. Unless they can pull out a last-minute
rabbit, it's game over and personal ruin. They have already lost the
properties they believed would provide them with riches. Now they also risk
their own homes and other assets. Their stories are far from unique.
Thousands of would-be amateur landlords are in a similar position. |
Guardian |
22 Mar |
|
Judge's second sex case
referred A second child sex
case involving the judge who jailed for two years a man who raped a girl of
10 has been referred to the Court of Appeal. The case involves a supervision
order imposed by Judge Julian Hall on a youth of 17 who abused two children.
The Solicitor General confirmed the case, heard in January, would be
referred to the Court of Appeal. Last year it doubled a two-year term
imposed by the judge on a child rapist describing it as unduly lenient. |
BBC |
22 Mar |
|
Seven years jail for lawyer
who siphoned £900,000 from wills to feather his nest
A crooked lawyer has been jailed for seven years after he looted £900,000
from wills and cash meant for charity so he could send his children to
public school, stock up with vintage wines and drive a classic sports car.
In the course of 28 years, Michael Wright, now 66, doubled or trebled his
actual salary. He set up seven false identities to channel the money from
wills and had the power to sign cheques paying legacies to their bank
accounts. When families complained or became suspicious he simply stole from
other estates to pay them what they were owed, Exeter Crown Court was told.
The lawyer, officially on £29,000 a year, was caught when his employers,
solicitors Harold Mitchelmore of Newton Abbot, Devon, introduced a new audit
system. |
Daily Mail |
20 Mar |
|
Fraud magistrate gets 18
months A magistrate has been
jailed for 18 months after admitting telling a contact he could delay his
court case in return for a £50,000 payment. Balbir Sandu, 63, who had been a
lay Wolverhampton magistrate, was sentenced at Birmingham Crown Court after
pleading guilty to the fraud charge. |
BBC |
19 Mar |
|
Couple stripped of £5million
A Weybridge solicitor and his wife have been stripped of £5.3million of
criminal assets hidden overseas. The Assets Recovery Agency was granted a
High Court order to take the money from John and Susan Ann Szepietowski of
Ashford House, Four Winds Park, St George's Hill, following an investigation
prompted by a separate drugs trafficking and money laundering probe by
Surrey Police. The ARA alleged the Szepietowskis had amassed a large
property portfolio through fraudulent mortgage claims and the laundering of
rental income through offshore accounts. It also alleged that the
Szepietowskis benefited from a phoenix fraud scam, involving the publishing
of adult magazines, and that their lavish lifestyle greatly exceeded their
known legitimate income. Solicitor Mr Szepietowski and his former building
society manager wife entered negotiations with the ARA in October last year. |
Wimbledon Guardian |
17 Mar |
|
Lawyers who cashed in on
miners' compensation fund donated to Brown dinner
A law firm representing injured
miners, which has earned itself £123million in controversial Government
payouts, has donated money to Gordon Brown's constituency party by
sponsoring a table at a fundraising dinner. Thompsons solicitors – which has
been accused by Labour MPs of being part of a legal "feeding frenzy" to
"milk" the £4billion compensation scheme for injured miners – sponsored the
table at one of Mr Brown's local party fundraising events in 2006. The
disclosure, which is revealed in Mr Brown's 2007 constituency party
accounts, will add to growing criticism of the fund's administration and
fuel demands for greater transparency over political donations. Thompsons
paid £650 towards the dinner in the Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath constituency
on May 19, 2006. The event gave diners the opportunity to hear Douglas
Alexander, who is now the International Development Secretary...Earlier this
month, the Commons Public Accounts Committee condemned Ministers for
"seriously mismanaging" the scheme after 750,000 people claimed – instead of
the expected 218,000. Two-thirds of the claims have cost more to administer
than the amounts paid out and some applications have taken so long to
process, the former miners have died before they could get their cash. The
total cost of the scheme is expected to rise to £6.4billion, with solicitors
receiving an astonishing £1.3billion to process the claims. Edward Leigh,
the Tory chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, said the Government
should have been "a lot tougher" with solicitors on the conditions attached
to their fees. Thompsons has made more out of the scheme than any other law
firm, receiving a total of £123.6million so far. |
Daily Mail |
16 Mar |
|
Crooked veteran solicitor
struck off A CROOKED solicitor
took almost £100,000 from bereaved clients and used the cash to pay her tax
bill, a hearing was told. University of Huddersfield law lecturer Lorraine
Miers, 49, blamed her cheating husband for financial difficulties when he
had an affair with her student, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal heard.
Yesterday she was struck off and ordered to pay costs of £10,000. |
Yorkshire Evening Post |
14 Mar |
|
Detective jailed over card
fraud A senior detective found
guilty of misusing police credit cards has been sentenced to three years in
prison. Det Ch Insp Peter Salkeld, 42, of Shoreham, was found guilty, after
a five-week trial, of 11 charges relating to theft and deception. Maidstone
Crown Court heard the charges related to use of a Sussex Police force credit
card, used to buy personal goods over a nine month period. Sussex Police
described Salkeld as "one greedy, dishonest individual". |
BBC |
14 Mar |
|
Lawyer seeks £13m sex bias
damages A top City lawyer is
seeking a record £13m ($26m) after winning a sex discrimination and
harassment lawsuit against the fund manager F&C Asset Management. Gill
Switalski, a 51-year-old mother of two disabled sons, says she was subjected
to an 18-month campaign of bullying and intimidation over her working hours
at the firm, which has nearly £104bn of assets under management. She is now
claiming as much as £13.4m in damages for resulting psychiatric problems,
loss of pension benefits and diminished career prospects after a London
employment tribunal ruled that she was treated less favourably than a male
colleague with a special needs child. That figure – nearly 100 times her
annual salary of £140,000 – exceeds the £11m claimed by a former HBOS
executive, Claire Bright, in a 2006 sex discrimination case, and is nearly
double the £7.5m once sought by Stephanie Villalba, the former head of
European private banking at Merrill Lynch. (While the victims of crooked
lawyers still get nothing, or are ignored.UJ) |
Financial Times See also:
Evening Standard |
12 Mar |
|
£7m mortgage scam rocks
Midlands A number of lenders
and mortgage brokers in the West Midlands are reported to have fallen victim
to a £7m mortgage scam. The perpetrators are thought to be a group of
solicitors based in East London who in one instance managed to con almost
£600,000 from an unsuspecting broker. Birmingham-based newspaper the Sunday
Mercury reported on Sunday that pensioner Barbara Moody had her £750,000
Birmingham home refinanced by the fraudster without her knowledge. BM
Solutions is reported to be one of the lenders caught up in the scam. |
Mortgage Strategy |
11 Mar |
|
Barristers told: last chance
to sign up for legal aid contract
The angry stand-off over new legal aid contracts — which threatens the
running of heavyweight criminal trials including terrorism, murder and rape
— comes to a head this week. The Legal Services Commission, which runs the
legal aid scheme, has given barristers a final chance to sign up to the
panel to do very high-cost cases — the most serious, complex and lengthy
trials, which account for nearly 10 per cent of the criminal legal aid
budget. Only 130 of 2,300 barristers who indicated interest in the scheme
have signed up. The deadline has been extended to this Friday. |
Times Online |
11 Mar |
|
SIF to become insurance
claims-handling provider
The Solicitors' Indemnity Fund (SIF)
is to become an insurance claims-handling provider in an effort to keep
insurance rates down. Legal & Professional Claims (LPC) will be launched in
June as a specialist professional indemnity (PI) claims company owned by the
Law Society. The SIF, which was established to provide PI cover to all
solicitors, was closed in 2000 with a surplus of £100m. Half of that money
was handed back to the Law Society and the remainder returned to firms. The
fund will be closed within five years after a small team finalises any
outstanding claims against it. |
The Lawyer |
10 Mar |
|
60 lawyers caught up in
mortgage fraud crackdown The
Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA), the body that regulates the legal
profession in England and Wales, is investigating up to 60 lawyers on
suspicion of mortgage fraud. The crackdown comes after the regulator saw a
substantial rise in the number of reports concerning specific solicitors
suspected of mortgage fraud. Last year the SRA received 293 such reports, up
from 85 in 2004. A spokesman said: “The SRA is investigating up to 60
solicitors who may have been involved in mortgage fraud.” |
Times Online |
06 Mar |
|
Trustworthy, client-friendly
and well paid - all signs of a lawyer?
What are solicitors for? Do they have public confidence and trust or are
they seen more cynically as a bunch of rogues ready to fleece clients? Jack
Straw, the Justice Secretary, reminded an audience last night that even
though the profession had moved on from Bleak House, there was still a view
— as Dickens put it — that “the one great principle of English law is to
make business for itself”. |
Times Online |
06 Mar |
|
Organised crime turning to
mortgage fraud Mortgage fraud
in the UK totalled £700m last year, the Association of Chief Police Officers
said yesterday in a report that warned organised crime groups were
increasingly targeting home loan providers. Mike Bowron, the commissioner of
the City of London police force, said mortgage fraud had become increasingly
popular with criminals because there was currently a relatively low risk of
detection and the potential for very large profits. Criminals are also using
the property markets to launder the proceeds of illegal activities,
including the supply of drugs, people trafficking and prostitution, he
said...The Acpo report says corrupt property professionals including
surveyors, mortgage brokers and solicitors are facilitating frauds. Common
crimes include surveyors deliberately over-valuing properties, applications
made on the basis of forged documentation and the use of fraudulent lease
contracts to inflate the value of commercial property artificially. |
Independent |
06 Mar |
|
Britannia probes solicitors
amid property fraud fears
Britannia Building Society is to launch a special unit to seek compensation
from law firms and surveyors in relation to negligent advice on property
deals. News of the launch comes as Eversheds faces a claim from the Bank of
Ireland relating to advice said to be negligent that it gave on a property
deal — the latest example of the growing trend for claims arising from
fraudulent property transactions. Britannia’s loss recovery unit, which will
go live in April, will investigate law firms and surveyors working on
transactions where its lending arm, Platform, suffers substantial losses
following the repossession and sale of a property or portfolio of
properties. |
Legal Week |
06 Mar |
|
Miners in 10-year wait for
payout Former miners have had
to wait over 10 years for government compensation for pit-related illnesses,
the Public Accounts Committee has found. Some of the men died while their
claims were being processed because ministers underestimated the volume and
complexity of their cases, it said. In the mean time solicitors earned more
than £1.3bn in handling the claims. The highly critical report argues that
more than 100,000 men are still waiting for payment of their settlements.
Gross underestimation The committee's chair, Conservative MP Edward
Leigh, accused the government of having "seriously mismanaged" the schemes
in their early stages. The report said it was too slow and ill-prepared in
to dealing with payments for men who suffered from lung disease or vibration
white finger, which affects the circulation of the hands. In more than two
thirds of cases, the average administration costs were higher than the
amount of compensation. One solicitors' firm alone raked in almost £124m.
The report said the government had expected about 218,000 claims for lung
disease and white finger, but there have in fact been about 762,000 claims.
Some of these were elderly and ill and in no position to wait for years for
compensation Conservative MP Edward Leigh
Estimates of the amount of compensation had been put at about £614m, but it
is thought the true cost once they are all settled will be about £4.1bn as
well as a further £2.3bn in administration.
The report said the average time for a claim to be processed was about two
years. Most of the remaining claims are expected to be settled by February
next year. The Department for Business Enterprise, which administers the
claims, said improvements had been made since the claim began. Mr Leigh
said: "Its attempt to implement the schemes swiftly, combined with its
underestimation of how many claims would be made and how complex some would
be, resulted in many claimants having to wait a very long time for the
compensation they were owed. "Some of these were elderly and ill and in no
position to wait for years for compensation - in some cases 10 years or
more. Some claimants even died while waiting. Far too much money went into
the solicitors' pockets and our committee expects the department to be
vigorous in pursuing them for the money Conservative MP Edward Leigh
"The taxpayer has also taken a big hit, with the cost of just administering
the schemes expected to total nearly £2.3bn." The compensation scheme was
put in place after British Coal was found negligent in its treatment of
ex-workers. But the government did not gather its own assessment of how many
claims there were likely to be, or how much they would cost, instead relying
on forecasts from British Coal. Neither did they realise that claims from
miners who subsequently died would be payable to the miners' widows and
families. 'An evil act' Mr Leigh added: "There are lessons aplenty
here for other parts of government planning and implementing new
compensation schemes. "Far too much money went into the solicitors' pockets
and our committee expects the department to be vigorous in pursuing them for
the money they have been ordered to repay."
Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract, who has long campaigned for miners
compensation, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that it was solicitors who
were most to blame. He said: "In fact I have no grumbles over the
government, because as soon as an award was made, the government made money
available. My complaint is with the solicitors." In what he described as "an
evil act", Lord Lofthouse said firms often first charged the government,
then raked money off the compensation awarded to the miners. |
BBC |
05 Mar |
|
MINER'S COMPO
But his lucky lawyer picks up £1,974 from taxpayers
A miner was given just 50p
compensation for chest disease - but his solicitor received £1,974 out of
taxpayers' pockets. The lawyer's fee for the "price of a packet of crisps"
award was branded "scandalous" yesterday. The compensation was the lowest
among 800,000 claims under a scheme for miners hit by "coal dust" disease -
who won an average of £5,000 each. But lawyers will have earned £1.3billion
from the scheme by next year. |
Mirror |
05 Mar |
|
Lawyers made over a bln from
miners' scheme LONDON
(Reuters) - The government's failure to keep a lid on legal fees saw
payments to lawyers spiral to over 1 billion pounds during its handling of
compensation schemes for miners, a group of MPs said on Tuesday. A total of
4.1 billion pounds will have been paid in compensation to former miners for
injuries related to coal dust and hand injuries. But another 1.3 billion
pounds went on lawyers' fees, while a further 1 billion pounds went on
administration and medical costs. Some miners had to wait more than 10 years
for their money as the legal process ran its course, with some dying before
receiving any compensation. "Far too much money went into the solicitors'
pockets," said Edward Leigh, chairman of the committee of public accounts.
The committee criticised the Department for Business, Enterprise and
Regulatory Reform, previously called the Department of Trade and Industry,
for its "weakness" in negotiating with the lawyers. "The department's
negotiation of the fees with solicitors was weak, with the result that it
paid fees significantly in excess of costs." Some legal firms received fees
from both the government and miners' compensation package, collecting as
much as 124 million pounds in two cases. MPs also accused the department of
"seriously mismanaging" the schemes, underestimating how many claims there
would be and their complexity. |
Reuters |
04 Mar |
|
Whitehall bungled miners'
compensation, say MPs
Whitehall "seriously mismanaged" a £4bn compensation scheme for former
miners suffering from lung disease and physical injuries, a report by a
committee of MPs said yesterday. Two-thirds of the claims cost more to
administer than the cash paid out and some claimants are still waiting for
the money a decade after they put in the claim. Others died before they got
the cash. The total cost of the scheme is expected to rise to £6.4bn - with
£2.3bn being spent on administration, including £1.3bn to private solicitors
to process claims. The Commons public accounts committee report condemns the
Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform for the handling of
the scheme...Some solicitors overcharged claimants or charged them fees when
the government was paying the bills. The department is seeking the return of
more than £80m from solicitors, while a number of big law firms are now
reimbursing claimants. |
Guardian |
04 Mar |
|
Irish solicitors wooing
wealthy Britons on tax Several
Irish legal firms are in talks with advisors to high-net worth individuals
living in Britain about moving to Ireland. The move follows plans to
introduce stricter rules governing foreign residents in Britain - so-called
‘non-doms’ - who have benefited from favourable tax treatment there. A
partner in one of Ireland’s leading law firms said the proposal by the
British government to charge non-domiciled residents £30,000 per year was
not enough to drive large numbers away. |
Sunday Business Post (IE) |
03 Mar |
|
Lawyers: the OFT flexes its
muscles, but will it work? The
OFT’s plans to offer up to £100,000 for information leading to the break-up
of cartels is an aggressive move from a regulator on a bit of a roll. Recent
successes including the £121.5 million fine against British Airways for
price-fixing on fuel surcharges with Virgin Atlantic (which was given
immunity), fines totalling £120 million in the supermarkets price-fixing
probe and the arrest of three British executives involved in a marine hoses
cartel have given the OFT a new wave of confidence. John Colahan, a
competition partner at Latham & Watkins in London, said today’s move is part
of the watchdog’s ”generally more activist approach that has seen it try to
establish itself further into people’s consciousness as a serious and
effective regulator”. |
Times Online |
01 Mar |
Back to top of page
|